It is not Virginia, and each state is a little different, but a judge in Springfield, Ohio recently found a non-compete involving surgeons to be unenforceable.
The surgeons, who are physician-investors in the soon-to-open Ohio Valley Medical Center, filed a complaint asking the court to find their non-compete with Springfield Surgery Center was unenforceable. The surgeons were previously limited partners in Springfield Surgery Center (SSC) and had signed a non-compete with SSC.
In holding the non-compete unenforceable, the found the following facts to be significant:
* Ohio law provides that restrictive clauses against physicians can be detrimental to public health care....a similar line of cases exists in Virginia under certain situations.
* The terms of the restrictive clause was too long.
* Ohio Valley Medical Hospital is a "surgical hospital" and not an "outpatient surgery center," and therefore the language of the restrictive clause did not not apply.
My Take: Virgina Courts may have reached the same decision.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Would you like Frith Law Firm to
review your non-compete, or discuss your options?
Contact us by phone: 540-985-0098,
or visit us online at http://www.frithlawfirm.com/.
Our business litigation practice centers around non-competition clauses, breach of contract, non-solicitation clauses, proprietary information claims, etc.
We serve all of Virginia and would be honored to help assess your options or handle your business litigation needs.
review your non-compete, or discuss your options?
Contact us by phone: 540-985-0098,
or visit us online at http://www.frithlawfirm.com/.
Our business litigation practice centers around non-competition clauses, breach of contract, non-solicitation clauses, proprietary information claims, etc.
We serve all of Virginia and would be honored to help assess your options or handle your business litigation needs.
0 comments:
Post a Comment